4.4 Article

Genotype instability during long-term subculture of lymphoblastoid cell lines

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 16-20

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2012.123

Keywords

lymphoblastoid cell line; single-nucleotide polymorphism; genome-wide association study

Funding

  1. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Republic of Korea [4845-301, 4851-307]
  2. Korea National Institute of Health [2011-N73005-00, 2011-N74003-00]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Korea government (MEST) [2012R1A2A1A03006155]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) promise to address the challenge posed by the limited availability of primary cells needed as a source of genomic DNA for genetic studies. However, the genetic stability of LCLs following prolonged culture has never been rigorously investigated. To evaluate genotypic errors caused by EBV integration into human chromosomes, we isolated genomic DNA from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and LCLs collected from 20 individuals and genotyped the DNA samples using the Affymetrix 500K SNP array set. Genotype concordance measurements between two sources of DNA from the same individual indicated that genotypic discordance is negligible in early-passage LCLs (<20 passages) but substantial in late-passage LCLs (450 passages). Analysis of concordance on a chromosome-by-chromosome basis identified genomic regions with a high frequency of genotypic errors resulting from the loss of heterozygosity observed in late-passage LCLs. Our findings suggest that, although LCLs harvested during early stages of propagation are a reliable source of genomic DNA for genetic studies, investigations that involve genotyping of the entire genome should not use DNA from late-passage LCLs. Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 58, 16-20; doi:10.1038/jhg.2012.123; published online 22 November 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available