4.3 Article

Carcass transport decisions in Homo antecessor subsistence strategies

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 425-446

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.05.012

Keywords

Differential transport; Anatomical profiles; Archaic Homo; Zooarchaeology; Hunting; Pleistocene

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia y Investigacion [CGL2009-12703-C03-02/BTE]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR 2009-188, 2009 SGR 324]
  3. Consejeria de Cultura y Turismo
  4. Junta de Castilla y Leon
  5. Atapuerca Foundation
  6. Duques de Soria Foundation-Atapuerca Foundation
  7. Ministry of Science and innovation of the Spanish Government [CGL2009-12703-C03-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pleistocene foragers used several prey acquisition and processing strategies. These strategies and their associated decisions are elucidated by taphonomic studies that cover animal transport, modifications by different agents and archaeological remains. Interpretative models of archaeological sites are by necessity based on natural and experimental observations. Ethno-archaeological data shows that several factors influenced decisions about carcass transport from the kill site to the home site. These factors often have little archaeological visibility. Diez et al. (1999) has previously interpreted the general characteristics of the macro-mammal remains from Gran Dolina Level TD6-2 (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain) as the result of anthropic accumulation, in which the anatomical profiles appeared to be the result of selective transport based on the animals' weight. Recent taphonomic analysis has shown that carcasses with different weights may be subject to similar transport strategies, suggesting that other factors influenced these choices. The hominins that occupied TD6-2 (the TD6-2 hominin group), at least sometimes, transported large carcasses to the cave in their entirety, implying participation by groups of individuals in hunting parties. These individuals delayed their consumption of large amounts of food, instead moving it to Gran Dolina, where it was shared with other group members. These decisions are evidence of social cooperation and food sharing amongst early European hominins. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available