4.8 Article

Modeling and optimization of building mix and energy supply technology for urban districts

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 161-177

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.076

Keywords

District energy systems; Multiobjective optimization; Genetic algorithm; Combined heat and power; Energy modeling

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-114747]
  2. Stanford Graduate Fellowship Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reducing the energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions of urban areas is paramount in research and practice, encompassing strategies to both reduce energy consumption and carbon intensity in both energy supply and demand. Most methods focus on one of these two approaches but few integrate decisions for supply and demand simultaneously. This paper presents a novel model that endogenously simulates energy supply and demand at a district scale on an hourly time scale. Demand is specified for a variety of building uses, and losses and municipal loads are calculated from the number of buildings in the district. Energy supply is modeled using technology-specific classes, allowing easy addition of specific equipment or types of energy generation. Standard interfaces allow expansion of the model to include new types of energy supply and demand. The model can be used for analysis of a single design alternative or optimization over a large design space, allowing exploration of various densities, mixes of uses, and energy supply technologies. An example optimization is provided for a community near San Francisco, California. This example uses 21 building types, 32 combined heat and power engines, and 16 chillers. The results demonstrate the ability to compare performance trade-offs and optimize for three objectives: life cycle cost, annual carbon dioxide emissions, and overall system efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available