4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Cost and outcomes of nosocomial bloodstream infections complicating major traumatic injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages 296-299

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.06.004

Keywords

Bloodstream infection; Cost; Nosocomial; Trauma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence, outcomes, and costs of trauma-related nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI). This was a 3: 1 matched cohort study in patients with severe trauma [defined by an injury severity score (ISS) >= 12] admitted to adult or paediatric regional trauma centres over a four-year period. Case patients with nosocomial BSI were matched to controls without a BSI based on predetermined criteria. Outcomes of interest included mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost attributable to nosocomial BSI. Fifty-seven cases were identified, among whom 51 were successfully matched to three controls. The mean ISS among cases was 30.3, and Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated pathogen (27%). Being a case was accompanied by a 27% relative increase in the hospital LOS (P = 0.02). The odds ratio for 30 day mortality associated with being a case was 5.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-30.8; P = 0.04). Among survivor-matched groups, being a case was associated with 53% relative increase in the geometric mean total hospital cost [$97,993 (95% CI: $70,143-136,899) for cases and $62,297 (95% CI: $52,155-74,411) for controls, P < 0.0001]. This is the first study to show that nosocomial BSI complicating severe trauma is associated with a substantial increase in hospital LOS and in total hospital cost. Our data provide justification to support efforts to reduce the adverse impact of BSI in trauma victims. (C) 2010 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available