4.5 Article

Hospital-based epidemiology: a strategy for 'dealing with Clostridium difficile'

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 319-325

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.009

Keywords

Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea; Clostridium difficile; Epidemiology; Hospital-acquired infection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) remains a major infection control problem. Uncertainty remains over methods of diagnosis and definitions for ascertaining provenance of cases. We undertook a prospective epidemiological study to better ascertain local epidemiology of 275 new cases (general practitioner and hospital) diagnosed in a large teaching hospital in the UK. The highest incidence of cases was found in haematology and critical care and a surprisingly high proportion, 29%, of hospital cases occurred in those aged <65 years. Fifty-five cases were diagnosed within 48 h of admission. Of these, those defined as 'community-acquired' varied between 9 and 25 according to various proposed definitions relating to acquisition and onset of diarrhoea. Of 48 community-onset cases, this number varied between 19 and 25, the variability making comparisons between National Health Service (NHS) trusts potentially inaccurate. Cases were followed for 90 days after diagnosis and all cause mortality data obtained. Of 227 cases diagnosed in hospital, 56 (25%) died within 30 days, 29% of whom were aged <65 years. Death certification data were available in 86% of these cases. C. difficile was recorded on 15 (31%) certificates and as a primary cause (la or 1 b) in 8 (17%) cases. Our study shows the value of local epidemiology for planning infection prevention and control strategies within an NHS trust and for contributing to the evidence base for national targets and policies. (C) 2009 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available