4.5 Article

Interventional evaluation of environmental contamination by vancomycin-resistant enterococci: failure of personnel, product, or procedure?

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 123-131

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.10.030

Keywords

Environmental; Disinfection; Infection control; Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus contamination

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U50/CCU516573]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is not clear whether improvement in environmental decontamination is more efficiently achieved through changes in cleaning products, cleaning procedures, or performance of cleaning personnel. To assess the impact of cleaning performance on environmental contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), we conducted a sequential trial in which a multifaceted environmental cleaning improvement intervention was introduced in a medical intensive care unit and respiratory step-down unit. The intervention included educational lectures for housekeepers and an observational programme of their activities without changes in cleaning products or written procedures. Following these interventions, the proportion of environmental sites cleaned improved from 49% to 85% (P < 0.001); contamination of environmental sites declined from 21% to 8% (P < 0.0001) before cleaning and from 13% to 8% (P < 0.0001) after cleaning. The improved cleaning and contamination rates persisted in a washout period. In a multivariate model, cleaning thoroughness strongly influenced the degree of environmental contamination, with a 6% decline in VRE prevalence with every 10% increase in percentage of sites cleaned. These findings suggest that surface contamination with VRE is due to a failure to clean rather than to a faulty cleaning procedure or product. (c) 2008 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available