4.5 Article

Infections due to Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase among hospitatised patients:: factors influencing mortality

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 116-122

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.11.012

Keywords

Escherichia coli infections; extended-spectrum beta-lactamase mortality; hospitatised patients

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We performed a retrospective matched-cohort study to determine the risk factors for mortality among patients with Escherichia coli infections. From January 1996 to December 2003, 100 hospitalised patients with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli infections were compared with patients not infected with ESBL-producing E. coli. These patients were selected according to the same site of infection and the closest date of admission. Comparison of the two groups showed that empirical antibiotic therapy was more often inadequate in patients infected with ESBL-producing E. coli (44% vs 15%; P < 0.01), and that early mortality (116% vs 6%; P = 0.02) and overall mortality (25% vs 11%; P = 0.01) were also significantly higher in patients with ESBL-producing E. coli infections. A multivariate model identified the urinary tract focus as the only independent risk factor influencing early mortality for E. coli infections [odds ratio (OR): 0.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.7; P = 0.01]. All 12 patients with ESBL-producing E. coli urinary tract infections treated initially with an oxyimino-beta-lactam survived. Subsequent analysis of the factors influencing early mortality in the cohort of 130 patients with a non-urinary E. coli infection found inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy as an independent risk factor for mortality only for non-urinary E. coli infections (adjusted OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.0-8.6; P = 0.03). The study showed that hospitalised patients with ESBL-producing

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available