4.0 Article

Palliative Needs of Spousal Caregivers of Patients With Heart Failure Followed Up at Specialized Heart Failure Centers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 142-150

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NJH.0b013e31820ce15e

Keywords

heart failure; spouse caregivers; palliative care

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NINR [1R15NR009976]
  2. American Heart Association: Pennsylvania/Delaware Affiliate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the incidence of heart failure increases, more patients and their caregivers are faced with needs related to the unpredictable nature of the illness. Palliative care interventions are an appropriate way to meet these needs; however, palliative care remains underutilized. Family caregivers, particularly spouses, play an important role providing care to these patients; thus, it is important to consider their needs when planning interventions. The purpose of this article was to describe the needs of spousal caregivers of patients followed up at specialized heart failure centers within the context of the dynamic ebb and flow of heart failure. Forty-five spouses (n = 45) were interviewed over 12 to 18 months to follow their changing needs. Grounded theory methods were used to collect and analyze data. Four categories of overarching needs amenable to palliative care interventions were identified: informational, financial, psychosocial, and physical. These needs were always present but changed during times of medical stability versus exacerbation/medical instability. Caregivers continually reprioritized their needs in response to the heart failure experience; therefore, episodic offerings of palliative care during exacerbations are inadequate. Nurses can play a pivotal role in facilitating comprehensive palliative care interventions to improve the experience of those caring for and living with heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available