4.2 Article

Accurate Quantitation of Ki67-positive Proliferating Hepatocytes in Rabbit Liver by a Multicolor Immunohistochemical (IHC) Approach Analyzed with Automated Tissue and Cell Segmentation Software

Journal

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 11-18

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/0022155412461154

Keywords

immunohistochemistry; multiple immunostaining; rabbit liver; hepatocytes; proliferation; automated scoring; quantitation; segmentation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determination of hepatocyte proliferation activity is hampered by the presence of Ki67-positive non-parenchymal cells. We validated a multicolor immunohistochemical (IHC) approach using multispectral tissue and cell segmentation software. Portal vein branches to the cranial liver lobes of 10 rabbits were embolized, leading to atrophy of the cranial lobes and hyperplasia of the caudal lobes. Slides from cranial and caudal lobes (n=20) were double-stained (CK8+18 and Ki67) and triple-stained (CK8+18, Ki67, and CD31). The Ki67 proliferation index was calculated using automated tissue and cell segmentation software and compared with manual counting by two independent observers. A substantial variation was seen in the number of Ki67-positive hepatocytes in the different specimens in both double and triple staining (range, 0-50). Correlation coefficients between manual counting and the digital analysis were 0.76 for observer 1 (p < 0.001) and 0.78 for observer 2 (p < 0.001) with double staining and R-2 = 0.91 for observer 1 and R-2 = 0.89 for observer 2, p < 0.001 with triple staining. In conclusion, in rabbit, the hepatocellular proliferation index can be reliably determined using automated tissue and cell segmentation software in combination with IHC multiple staining. Our findings may be useful in clinical practice when Ki67 proliferation index yields prognostic significance. (J Histochem Cytochem 61: 11-18, 2013)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available