4.2 Article

Application of Immunohistochemical Staining to Detect Antigen Destruction as a Measure of Tissue Damage

Journal

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 60, Issue 9, Pages 683-693

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/0022155412452146

Keywords

antigen destruction immunohistochemistry method; hematoxylin and eosin; MTT; immunohistochemistry; directed energy device; tissue damage/viability

Categories

Funding

  1. Air Force Surgeon General's Office [FA7014-09-2-0002, FA7014-09-2-0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrocautery and directed energy devices (DEDs) such as lasers, which are used in surgery, result in tissue damage that cannot be readily detected by traditional histological methods, such as hematoxylin and eosin staining. Alternative staining methods, including 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) to stain live tissue, have been reported. Despite providing superior detection of damaged tissue relative to the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) method, the MTT method possesses a number of drawbacks, most notably that it must be carried out on live tissue samples. Herein, we report the development of a novel staining method, antigen destruction immunohistochemistry (ADI), which can be carried out on paraffin-embedded tissue. The ADI method takes advantage of epitope loss to define the area of tissue damage and provides many of the benefits of live tissue MTT staining without the drawbacks inherent to that method. In addition, the authors provide data to support the use of antibodies directed at a number of gene products for use in animal tissue for which there are no species-specific antibodies commercially available, as well as an example of a species-specific direct antibody. Data are provided that support the use of this method in many tissue models, as well as evidence that ADI is comparable to the live tissue MTT method. (J Histochem Cytochem 60:683-693, 2012)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available