4.2 Article

Factors in Tissue Handling and Obtained From Formalin-fixed, Processing That Impact RNA Paraffin-embedded Tissue

Journal

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 56, Issue 11, Pages 1033-1042

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/jhc.2008.951863

Keywords

paraffin embedded; gene expression; RNA integrity; real-time; RT-PCR; tissue fixation and processing

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. Center for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most common specimen available for molecular assays on tissue after diagnostic histopathological examination. RNA from FFPE tissue suffers from strand breakage and cross-linking. Despite excellent extraction methods, RNA quality from FFPE material remains variable. To address the RNA quality factors within FFPE tissues, we studied RNA quality, isolating individual elements of the tissue fixation and processing including length of fixation in formalin and the type of buffer incorporated in the fixative. We examined the impact of the length of the tissue processing cycle as well. The optimal fixation period of 12-24 hr in phosphate-buffered formalin resulted in better-quality RNA. Longer tissue processing times were associated with higher quality RNA. We determined that the middle region of gene suffers less damage by these processes as shown by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. These data provide key information for the development of methods of analysis of gene expression in archival FFPE tissues and contribute to the establishment of objective standards for the processing and handling of tissue in surgical pathology. This manuscript contains online supplemental material at http://www.jhc.org. Please visit this article online to view these materials. (J Histochem Cytochem 56:1033-1042, 2008)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available