4.3 Article

A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms' behaviour: a case study on the CEC'2005 Special Session on Real Parameter Optimization

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEURISTICS
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 617-644

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10732-008-9080-4

Keywords

Statistical analysis of experiments; Evolutionary algorithms; Parametric tests; Non-parametric tests

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science
  2. [TIN2005-08386-C05S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, there has been a growing interest for the experimental analysis in the field of evolutionary algorithms. It is noticeable due to the existence of numerous papers which analyze and propose different types of problems, such as the basis for experimental comparisons of algorithms, proposals of different methodologies in comparison or proposals of use of different statistical techniques in algorithms' comparison. In this paper, we focus our study on the use of statistical techniques in the analysis of evolutionary algorithms' behaviour over optimization problems. A study about the required conditions for statistical analysis of the results is presented by using some models of evolutionary algorithms for real-coding optimization. This study is conducted in two ways: single-problem analysis and multiple-problem analysis. The results obtained state that a parametric statistical analysis could not be appropriate specially when we deal with multiple-problem results. In multiple-problem analysis, we propose the use of non-parametric statistical tests given that they are less restrictive than parametric ones and they can be used over small size samples of results. As a case study, we analyze the published results for the algorithms presented in the CEC'2005 Special Session on Real Parameter Optimization by using non-parametric test procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available