4.3 Article

Genetic Signature of Reproductive Manipulation in the Phylogeography of the Bat Fly, Trichobius major

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEREDITY
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages 705-718

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esr090

Keywords

AFLP; Arsenophonus; bat fly; Rickettsia; reproductive parasites; Trichobius major

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0610844]
  2. University of Central Oklahoma, Dr Joe C. Jackson College of Graduate Studies and Research Faculty Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bat fly (Trichobius major) is a blood-feeding ectoparasite of the cave myotis (Myotis velifer). A recent mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) study examining population structure of T. major in the South Central United States detected a single haplotype from all individuals examined (N = 48 from 12 different caves), representing one of only a few known examples of such widespread mtDNA uniformity. We examined nuclear genetic diversity using amplified fragment length polymorphism and detected high levels of nuclear genetic diversity in all populations sampled. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses indicated significant levels of gene flow among caves > 700 km apart, suggesting the absence of mtDNA diversity in T. major is the result of a selective sweep, not a demographic event (i.e., a recent bottleneck). One mechanism by which mtDNA sweeps occur in arthropods is through bacterial parasites that manipulate host reproduction and mtDNA inheritance. We used PCR to test for the presence of all known reproductive parasites and detected a widespread infection (91.33% infection rate) of T. major with a novel Arsenophonus bacterium, as well as the infection of 2 individuals (1.16% infection rate) with a novel strain of Rickettsia. We discuss the implications for T. major phylogeography and the necessity of a bigenomic approach in arthropod population genetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available