4.3 Article

Comparative Performance of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Microsatellite Markers for Population Genetic Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEREDITY
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages 556-564

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp028

Keywords

neutrality; population structure; single nucleotide polymorphism

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture Current Research Information System (CRIS) [016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microsatellite loci are standard genetic markers for population genetic analysis, whereas single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are more recent tools that require assessment of neutrality and appropriate use in population genetics. Twelve SNP markers were used to describe the genetic structure of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (LeConte; Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in the United States of America and revealed a high mean observed heterozygosity (0.40 +/- 0.059) and low global F-ST (0.029). Pairwise F-ST estimates ranged from 0.007 to 0.045, and all but 2 populations showed significant levels of genetic differentiation (P < 0.008). Population parameters and conclusions based on SNP markers were analogous to that obtained by use of microsatellite markers from the identical population samples. SNP-based F-ST estimates were 3-fold higher than corresponding estimates from microsatellites, wherein lower microsatellite F-ST estimates likely resulted from an overestimate of migration rates between subpopulations due to convergence of allele size (homoplasy). No significant difference was observed in the proportion of SNP or microsatellite markers loci that were nonneutral within populations. SNP markers provided estimates of population genetic parameters consistent with those from microsatellite data, and their low back mutation rates may result in reduced propensity for error in estimation of population parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available