4.3 Review

Climbing Mount Probable: Mutation as a Cause of Nonrandomness in Evolution

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEREDITY
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages 637-647

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp048

Keywords

evolution; genomics; mutation bias; population genetics

Funding

  1. East Tennessee State University and Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classic view of evolution as shifting gene frequencies in the Modern Synthesis literally means that evolution is the modulation of existing variation (standing variation), as opposed to a new mutations view of evolution as a 2-step process of mutational origin followed by acceptance-or-rejection (via selection and drift). The latter view has received renewed attention, yet its implications for evolutionary causation still are not widely understood. We review theoretical results showing that this conception of evolution allows for a role of mutation as a cause of nonrandomness, a role that could be important but has been misconceived and associated misleadingly with neutral evolution. Specifically, biases in the introduction of variation, including mutational biases, may impose predictable biases on evolution, with no necessary dependence on neutrality. As an example of how important such effects may be, we present a new analysis partitioning the variance in mean rates of amino acid replacement during human-chimpanzee divergence to components of codon mutation and amino acid exchangeability. The results indicate that mutational effects are not merely important but account for most of the variance explained. The challenge that such results pose for comparative genomics is to address mutational effects as a necessary part of any analysis of causal factors. To meet this challenge requires developing knowledge of mutation as a biological process, understanding how mutation imposes propensities on evolution, and applying methods of analysis that incorporate mutational effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available