4.3 Article

The Genetic Impact of Translocations and Habitat Fragmentation in Chamois (Rupicapra) spp.

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEREDITY
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages 691-708

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp053

Keywords

conservation; hybridization; management; microsatellites; mtDNA; taxonomy

Funding

  1. Research Fund of the Autonomous Province of Trento
  2. Centro di Ecologia Alpina
  3. University of Ferrara
  4. Czech Science Foundation [GACR 206/01/0562]
  5. Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [GAAV IAA600930609]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chamois is a useful species with which to investigate the combined genetic impact of habitat fragmentation, over hunting, and translocations. Genetic variation within and between chamois (genus Rupicapra) populations was analyzed in 259 individuals from 16 sampling sites located in Italy, Spain, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic. Two mitochondrial DNA markers (control region and cytochrome b) and 11 nuclear microsatellites were typed. The principal results of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) high and significant differentiation between almost all chamois populations is observed even on a microgeographical scale, probably caused by the patchy distribution of this species, sharp geographical barriers to gene flow, and drift effects related to recent bottlenecks; 2) historical translocation events have left a clear genetic signature, including interspecific hybridization in some Alpine localities; 3) the Apennine subspecies of chamois, Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata, shows a high and similar level of divergence (about 1.5 My) from the Pyrenean (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) and the Alpine (Rupicapra rupicapra) chamois; therefore, the specific status of these taxa should be revised. These results confirm the potential of population genetic analyses to dissect and interpret complex patterns of diversity in order to define factors important to conservation and management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available