4.8 Article

Increased survival in hepatocellular carcinoma with iodine-125 implantation plus radiofrequency ablation: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 1304-1311

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.026

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radiofrequency ablation; Iodine-125 implantation; RCTs; Survival; Safety

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81201758, 81071990]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2012A030400055, 2011B031800184]
  3. Science and Technology projects of Guangzhou [2011J410010, 2011J4300066]
  4. Guangdong Province Medical Research Funds [A2012131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether use of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous iodine-125 (I-125) seed implantation results in better progression-free survival compared with the use of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: 136 patients were randomly assigned to undergo HCC treatment with RFA and percutaneous iodine-125 seed implantation (RFA-I-125, n = 68) or RFA-only (n = 68). A total of 91 patients had hepatitis B viral infection in both groups. Rates of tumour recurrence and overall survival were evaluated. Results: The probabilities of recurrence at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 4.5%, 22.1%, and 39.8% in the RFA-I-125 group; and 14.8%, 35.3%, and 57.4% in the RFA-only group, respectively. The recurrence rate in the RFA-I-125 group was significantly lower than in the RFA-only group (HR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.317-0.815; p = 0.004 by log-rank test). Local and intrahepatic recurrence was significantly lower in the RFA-I-125 group than in the RFA-only group (7.3% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.012 by log-rank test; 17.6% vs. 32.3%, p = 0.041 by log-rank test). The probabilities of survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 100%, 86.7%, and 66.1% in the RFA-I-125 group and 95.6%, 75.0%, and 47.0% in the RFA-only group, respectively. The survival rate in the RFA-I-125 group was significantly better than in the RFA-only group (HR, 0.502; 95% CI, 0.313-0.806; p = 0.003 by log-rank test). Cox regression model indicated that the treatment group and tumour size were both recurrence-related and overall survival-related prognostic factors. Conclusions: There were significant differences in overall survival and cumulative recurrence between RFA-I-125 and RFA-only for patients with small HCCs (63 cm). Treatment with RFA-I-125 facilitated better local and intrahepatic tumour control and long-term survival compared with treatment of RFA alone. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01717729. (C) 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available