4.8 Article

Invasive aspergillosis in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 267-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.09.011

Keywords

Alcoholic hepatitis; Infection; Aspergillosis; Corticosteroids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH) has a poor short-term prognosis. Although infections are frequent complications of AH, the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and its impact on outcome remain unknown. Methods: We prospectively followed 94 biopsy-proven severe AH episodes for 3 months. We retrospectively reviewed our diagnosis of IA based on EORTC/MSG and AspICU criteria, except for host factors. Results: Fifteen IA (6 proven, 8 probable, and 1 possible) were diagnosed after a median delay of 26 days following diagnosis of AH. The sites of infection were the lungs (n = 11) and central nervous system (n = 2), while IA was disseminated in 2 cases. Baseline MELD score >= 24 and ICU admission were independent risk factors for IA. Thirteen IA occurred in the context of corticosteroids, and 2 had received no specific treatment for AH. Non-response to corticosteroids at day 7 was not a risk factor for IA, but IA was associated with absence of liver improvement at day 28. Despite antifungal treatment, 3-month transplant-free survival of patients with IA was 0% compared to 53% in those without IA. IA, Lille score >= 0.45, and overt encephalopathy were independent predictors of transplant-free mortality. Conclusions: IA is a frequent complication of severe AH and carries a very high risk of mortality. Systematic screening for IA should be recommended in these patients. Further studies are needed to identify high-risk populations requiring antifungal prophylactic treatment. (C) 2013 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available