4.8 Article

Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by combined serum biomarkers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 1363-1370

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.025

Keywords

Fatty liver; Liver biopsy; Cytokeratin-18; Fibroblast growth factor 21; Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein

Funding

  1. Research Grant Council, Hong Kong [477710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: The diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) is limited by the need for liver biopsy. We aimed at testing the accuracy of cytokeratin-18 fragment (CK-18), adipocyte fatty acid binding protein (AFABP) and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) for the diagnosis of NAFLD and NASH. Methods: 146 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 74 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included. Serum CK-18, AFABP and FGF21 levels were determined by enzyme-linked imnnunosorbent assay. Results: Serum CK-18, AFABP, and FGF21 increased in a stepwise fashion in control subjects (median 103 U/L, 15.4 ng/ml, and 104 pg/ml), patients with non-NASH NAFLD (263 U/L, 18.9 ng/ml, and 249 pg/ml) and NASH (418 U/L, 19.4 ng/ml, and 354 pg/ml) (p <0.001, 0.060, and 0.016, respectively). The area under receiver-operating characteristics curve to diagnose NAFLD and NASH was 0.91 and 0.70 for CK-18, 0.66 and 0.59 for AFABP, and 0.84 and 0.62 for FGF21. At cut-offs of 203 and 670 U/L, CK-18 had 71% negative predictive value (NPV) and 77% positive predictive value (PPV) to exclude and diagnose NASH. A 2-step approach measuring CK-18 followed by FGF21 further improved the NPV to 74% and PPV to 82%. In a validation cohort of 51 patients with paired liver biopsies, the NPV and PPV of the 2-step approach were 67% and 78%, respectively. Conclusions: CK-18 is the most accurate biomarker for NAFLD and NASH. A two-step approach using CK-18 and FGF21 further improves the accuracy in diagnosing NASH. (C) 2012 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available