4.8 Article

A comprehensive risk assessment of mortality following donation after cardiac death liver transplant - An analysis of the national registry

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 808-813

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.01.040

Keywords

Liver transplantation; Donation after cardiac death; Donation after brain death; Patient survival

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [5 T32 DK077662-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Organ scarcity has resulted in increased utilization of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. Prior analysis of patient survival following DCD liver transplantation has been restricted to single institution cohorts and a limited national experience. We compared the current national experience with DCD and DBD livers to better understand survival after transplantation. Methods: We compared 1113 DCD and 42,254 DBD recipients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database between 1996 and 2007. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox regression. Results: DCD recipients experienced worse patient survival compared to DBD recipients (p < 0.001). One and 3 year survival was 82% and 71% for DCD compared to 86% and 77% for DBD recipients. Moreover, DCD recipients required re-transplantation more frequently (DCD 14.7% vs. DBD 6.8%, p < 0.001), and re-transplantation survival was markedly inferior to survival after primary transplant irrespective of graft type. Amplification of mortality risk was observed when DCD was combined with cold ischemia time >12 h (HR = 1.81), shared organs (HR = 1.69), recipient hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 1.80), recipient age >60 years (HR = 1.92), and recipient renal insufficiency (HR = 1.82). Conclusions: DCD recipients experience significantly worse patient survival after transplantation. This increased risk of mortality is comparable in magnitude to, but often exacerbated by other well-established risk predictors. Utilization decisions should carefully consider DCD graft risks in combination with these other factors. (C) 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available