4.8 Article

Retransplantation in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 962-970

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.006

Keywords

Severe recurrence; Cirrhosis; MELD; Survival

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI080239]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection recurs universally after liver transplantation (LT) and fibrosis progression is accelerated in the graft. Retransplantation (RT) is the only therapeutic option to achieve long-term survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis after LT. Patient and graft survival rates after RI are inferior to those after primary LT. It is generally accepted that severe hepatitis C recurrence (cholestatic hepatitis) and forms with rapid fibrosis progression have a poor survival after RT. However, it is not clear whether rapid fibrosis progression in the first graft will be followed by the same rate of fibrosis progression in the second graft. The use of prognostic scores as screening tools has shown an improvement in survival in HCV-infected patients after RI, reaching similar survival rates as those obtained in non HCV-infected patients. Moreover, these scores can identify candidates with a high risk of mortality in whom the use of a new organ would be unreasonable. Prevention of severe hepatitis C recurrence could be the first step to avoid RT. Thus, antiviral treatment on the waiting list (if possible) and early identification and treatment of patients with severe hepatitis C recurrence may be a good strategy to avoid RT. In addition, active management of factors which can accelerate fibrosis progression (donor age, posttransplant diabetes, high dose of corticosteroids) might reduce the incidence of severe forms of hepatitis C recurrence. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the European Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available