4.8 Article

Entecavir shows limited efficacy in HBeAg-positive hepatitis B patients with a partial virologic response to adefovir therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 674-683

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.033

Keywords

Hepatitis B treatment; Entecavir; Adefovir; Suboptimal response; Antiviral drug resistance

Funding

  1. Bristol Myers Squibb
  2. Gilead
  3. Novartis
  4. Roche
  5. Schering-Plough

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: We investigated the efficacy of entecavir in lamivudine-experienced and -naive patients with persistently high HBV DNA during adefovir treatment. Methods: Fourteen chronic hepatitis B patients (57% lamivudine-experienced) with a viral load above 5log(10) copies/mL after 12 months of adefovir therapy and thereafter were treated with entecavir 1 mg daily. Results: During a median follow-up of 15 months (range: 8-23 months) one of six lamivudine-naive and none of the eight lamivudine-experienced patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA (<373 copies/mL). HBeAg loss occurred in none of the subjects. Two lamivudine-experienced patients demonstrated the rtM2041 mutation; no other entecavir-resistant substitutions were detected (rtI169, rtT184, rtS202, and rtM250). Two of three patients with genotypic adefovir resistance at baseline demonstrated a rapid virologic response to entecavir, but undetectable HBV DNA was not achieved. To attain a better antiviral response the dosage of entecavir was increased to 2 mg daily in two patients, resulting in further viral load decline for both of them. Conclusions: Entecavir monotherapy dosed at 1 mg resulted in a slow reduction of viral load in both lamivudine-experienced and -naive patients with persistently high HBV DNA during adefovir therapy. Increasing the dosage of entecavir led to further HBV DNA decline. (c) 2008 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available