4.8 Article

The Aurora kinase inhibitor VE-465 has anticancer effects in pre-clinical studies of human hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 518-527

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.022

Keywords

Aurora kinases; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Small-molecule inhibitor; Apoptosis; Xenograft

Funding

  1. National Taiwan University [95R0066-BM01-02]
  2. Department of Health (Taiwan) [DOH96-TD-B111-001]
  3. National Science Council (Taiwan) [NSC96-3112-B-002-036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Hepatocelfular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and novel therapies are urgently needed. Recently, aberrant expression of Aurora kinases has been reported in various human cancers including HCC. We sought to investigate the potential of a potent and selective Aurora kinase inhibitor, VE-465, for targeted therapy of HCC. Methods: Cytotoxicity effects of VE-465 were tested in Huh-7 and HepG2 cell lines. Inhibition of Aurora kinase activity was demonstrated by Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining. Mitotic perturbation was visualized by confocal microscopy. Cell cycle profiles and apoptosis were assessed by flow cytometry. In vivo efficacy was determined in nude mice with human HCC xenografts. Results: We demonstrated that VE-465 induced proliferation blockade, histone H3 (Ser10) dephosphorylation, mitotic disturbance, endoreduplication, and apoptosis in Huh-7 and HepG2 cells. We also found that VE-465 suppressed Aurora kinase activity, prevented tumor growth, and induced apoptosis in a Huh-7 xenograft model. Conclusions: These findings show that VE-465 has potent anticancer effects in human HCC. Inhibitors of Aurora kinases may deserve further exploration as molecular targeted agents against HCC. (C) 2008 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available