4.8 Article

Genetic factors of susceptibility and of severity in primary biliary cirrhosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 1038-1045

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.07.027

Keywords

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4); Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha); Anion exchanger 2 (AE2)/SLC4A2; Multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1)/ABCB1; Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA); Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: In primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), pathogenesis is influenced by genetic factors that remain poorly elucidated up to now. We investigated the impact of sequence diversity in candidate genes involved in immunity (CTLA-4 and TNF alpha), in bile formation (10 hepatobiliary transporter genes) and in the adaptative response to cholestasis (three nuclear receptor genes) on the susceptibility and severity of PBC. Methods: A total of 42 Ht SNPs were identified and compared in 258 PBC patients and two independent groups of 286 and 269 healthy controls. All participants were white continental individuals with French ancestry. Results: Ht SNPs of CTLA-4 and TNF alpha genes were significantly associated with susceptibility to PBC. The progression rate of liver disease under ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy was significantly linked to SNPs of TNF alpha and SLC4A2/anion exchanger 2 (AE2) genes. A multivariate Cox regression analysis including clinical and biochemical parameters showed that SLC4A2/AE2 variant was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: These data point to a primary role of genes encoding regulators of the immune system in the susceptibility to PBC. They also demonstrate that allelic variations in TNF alpha and SLC4A2/AE2 have a significant impact on the evolutive profile of PBC under UDCA therapy. (C) 2008 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available