4.8 Article

Effects of N-acetylcysteine administration in hepatic microcirculation of rats with biliary cirrhosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 25-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.02.012

Keywords

anti-oxidants; intrahepatic resistance; N-acetylcysteine; nitrotyrosilation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Increased intrahepatic resistance (IHR) in cirrhosis is due to fibrosis and hepatic endothelial dysfunction (HED). Besides producing fibrosis, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) promotes ROS-related nitration of anti-oxidative enzymes in cirrhotic livers. Tyrosine nitration (nitrotyrosilation)-related inactivation of anti-oxidative enzymes is increased in cirrhotic livers. This study investigates effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) administrations in bile-duct-ligation (BDL) rats. Methods: This study measured portal venous pressure (PVP), MR, hepatic endothelial function, hepatic levels of antioxidants and oxidants, type III procollagen (PIIIP), proteins expression of thromboxane synthase (TXS), nitrotyrosine, manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), and hepatic NOx and thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) production in perfusates. Results:The improvement of HED was associated with decreased PVP and IHR, hepatic protein and mRNA levels of PIIIP, protein expression of TXS and nitrotyrosine, oxidants and production of TXA(2) in NAC-treated BDL rat livers. Conversely, hepatic NOx production, anti-oxidants, and protein expression of MnSOD were increased in NAC-treated BDL rat livers. Conclusions: In NAC-treated cirrhotic rats, the decrease in IHR was mainly caused by its anti-oxidative effect-related prevention of hepatic fibrogenesis associated with the decrease of oxidants-related nitrotyrosilation and improvement of HED. (C) 2008 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available