4.8 Article

Identification of novel candidate tumour marker genes for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 207-216

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.025

Keywords

differential diagnosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; SAGE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Specific markers are required for early detection and diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); however, the tumour markers currently in use are not specific for ICC. Methods: We compared an ICC cDNA library with that of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). The expression patterns in each were confirmed by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunoblotting and immunohistochemical analysis of 74 samples including 16 ICC samples. Results: A comparison of the two libraries revealed distinct gene expression patterns for each type of liver cancer. In addition to the known tumour markers, we detected nine novel genes associated with ICC. By comparing the mean transcript abundance in the ICC library with those in other libraries, including gastric, colon, prostate and breast cancer, together with our RT-PCR results, we identified three genes as specific markers of ICC: biglycan, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5 and claudin-4. Immunoblotting and immunohistochemical analyses showed that claudin-4 was highly expressed in ICC. Moreover, discrimination analysis revealed that a combination of these genes could be used to distinguish ICC from HCC or metastatic adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: We identified novel marker genes of ICC that are potentially useful for the diagnosis of liver cancer. (C) 2008 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available