4.7 Article

The impact of therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia on intelligence quotients; results of the risk-stratified randomized central nervous system treatment trial MRC UKALL XI

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1756-8722-4-42

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; IQ; central nervous system; morbidity; cranial radiotherapy; methotrexate; neuropsychometric; paediatric

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (UK) [G9101597]
  2. Chief Scientist Office [SCD/08] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686856] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0300117, MC_U137686856] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The MRC UKALLXI trial tested the efficacy of different central nervous system (CNS) directed therapies in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). To evaluate morbidity 555/1826 randomised children underwent prospective psychological evaluations. Full Scale, verbal and performance IQs were measured at 5 months, 3 years and 5 years. Scores were compared in; (1) all patients (n = 555) versus related controls (n = 311), (2) low-risk children (presenting white cell count (WCC) < 50 x 10(9)/l) randomised to intrathecal methotrexate (n = 197) versus intrathecal and high-dose intravenous methotrexate (HDM) (n = 202), and (3) high-risk children (WCC >= 50 x 10(9)/l, age >= 2 years) randomised to HDM (n = 79) versus cranial irradiation (n = 77). Results: There were no significant differences in IQ scores between the treatment arms in either low-or high-risk groups. Despite similar scores at baseline, results at 3 and 5 years showed a significant reduction of between 3.6 and 7.3 points in all three IQ scores in all patient groups compared to controls (P < 0.002) with a higher proportion of children with IQs < 80 in the patient groups (13% vs. 5% at 3 years p = 0.003). Conclusion: Children with ALL are at risk of CNS morbidity, regardless of the mode of CNS-directed therapy. Further work needs to identify individuals at high-risk of adverse CNS outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available