4.4 Article

Buoyancy Driven Heat Transfer of Nanofluids in a Tilted Enclosure

Journal

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4000744

Keywords

alumina; computational fluid dynamics; confined flow; copper; copper compounds; differential equations; integration; nanofluidics; nanoparticles; natural convection; particle size; polynomials; silver; titanium compounds; two-phase flow; water

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Buoyancy driven heat transfer of water-based nanofluids in a differentially heated, tilted enclosure is investigated in this study. The governing equations (obtained with the Boussinesq approximation) are solved using the polynomial differential quadrature method for an inclination angle ranging from 0 deg to 90 deg, two different ratios of the nanolayer thickness to the original particle radius (0.02 and 0.1), a solid volume fraction ranging from 0% to 20%, and a Rayleigh number varying from 10(4) to 10(6). Five types of nanoparticles, Cu, Ag, CuO, Al2O3, and TiO2 are taken into consideration. The results show that the average heat transfer rate from highest to lowest is for Ag, Cu, CuO, Al2O3, and TiO2. The results also show that for the particle radius generally used in practice (beta=0.1 or beta=0.02), the average heat transfer rate increases to 44% for Ra=10(4), to 53% for Ra=10(5), and to 54% for Ra=10(6) if the special case of theta=90 deg, which also produces the minimum heat transfer rates, is not taken into consideration. As for theta=90 deg, the heat transfer enhancement reaches 21% for Ra=10(4), 44% for Ra=10(5), and 138% for Ra=10(6). The average heat transfer rate shows an increasing trend with an increasing inclination angle, and a peak value is detected. Beyond the peak point, the foregoing trend reverses and the average heat transfer rate decreases with a further increase in the inclination angle. Maximum heat transfer takes place at theta=45 deg for Ra=10(4) and at theta=30 deg for Ra=10(5) and 10(6).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available