4.5 Article

Physiologic assessment of the ex vivo donor lung for transplantation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 1120-1126

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.016

Keywords

Lung transplantation; ex vivo lung perfusion; lung preservation; lung evaluation; lung physiology; lung resuscitation

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  2. Surgeon Scientist Program at the University of Toronto
  3. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of donor lungs by normothermic ex vivo acellular perfusion has improved the safety of organ utilization. However, this strategy requires a critical re-evaluation of the parameters used to assess lungs during ex vivo perfusion compared with those traditionally used to evaluate the donor lung in vivo. Using a porcine model, we studied the physiology of acellular lung perfusion with the aim of improving the accuracy of clinical ex vivo evaluation. METHODS: Porcine lungs after 10 hours of brain death and 24 hours of cold ischemia and uninjured control lungs were perfused for 12 hours and then transplanted. PaO2, compliance, airway pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were measured. Ventilation with 100% nitrogen and addition of red blood cells to the perfusate were used to clarify the physiologic disparities between in vivo blood perfusion and ex vivo acellular perfusion. RESULTS: During 12 hours of ex vivo perfusion, injured lungs developed edema with decreased compliance and increased airway pressure, but ex vivo PO2 remained stable. After transplantation, injured lungs demonstrated high vascular resistance and poor PaO2. A reduced effect of shunt on ex vivo lung perfusion PO2 was found to be attributable to the linearization of the relationship between oxygen content and PO2, which occurs with acellular perfusate. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo PO2 may not be the first indication of lung injury and, taken alone, may be misleading in assessing the ex vivo lung. Thus, evaluation of other physiologic parameters takes on greater importance. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012;31:1120-6 (C) 2012 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available