4.5 Article

Comparison of Baseline Characteristics and Survival Between Patients With Idiopathic and Connective Tissue Disease-related Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 621-627

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.02.016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Both idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) related to connective tissue diseases (CPAH) are classified in the group of PAH disorders. However, CPAH has a particularly worse prognosis than IPAH. Few studies have compared the clinical, functional and hemodynamic profiles of IPAH and CPAH. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort stud), of patients with IPAH or CPAH. Demographic characteristics, functional status (FE), pulmonary), function test and hemodynamic values at the time of diagnosis were compared between the two etiologies. Global cumulative survival rates free from transplantation (SET) and Survival according to date of diagnosis were analyzed. Results: Despite similar PAR severity, patients with CPAH showed a more severe baseline impairment of 6-minute walking test (6MWT) (307 +/- 116 m vs 378 +/- 101 m) and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (57 +/- 25% vs 75 +/- 30% of predicted) than IPAH (p < 0.01). Survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years of follow-up were 87%, 71% and 63% for IPAH, and 70%, 53% and 42% for CPAH, respectively (p < 0.05). IPAH showed better survival when treatment was started after Year 2000 (p = 0.01). However, CPAH showed a poorer prognosis than IPAH in the more recent era (p < 0.05). CPAH (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.03), DLCO <80% (HR = 1.98) and treatment before Year 2000 (HR = 2.27) were associated with an independent increased risk of death or transplantation. Conclusions: Despite similar functional and hemodynamic severity, patients with CPAH showed a more severe baseline impairment of 6MWT and DLCO and worse over-all prognosis than IPAH. Both IPAH and CPAH survival improved in the current era. Nevertheless, CPAH still showed a poorer prognosis than IPAH. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:621-7. Copyright (C) 2009 by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available