4.4 Article

Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 219-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.005

Keywords

Sugar-sweetened beverage tax; Obesity; Nutrient demand models; Instrumental variables

Funding

  1. Healthy Eating Research, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [65062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the 2006 Homescan panel, we estimate the changes in energy, fat and sodium purchases resulting from a tax that increases the price of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) by 20% and the effect of such a tax on body weight. In addition to substitutions that may arise with other beverages, we account for substitutions between SSBs and 12 major food categories. Our main findings are that the tax would result in a decrease in store-bought energy of 24.3 kcal per day per person, which would translate into an average weight loss of 1.6 pounds during the first year and a cumulated weight loss of 2.9 pounds in the long run. We do not find evidence of substitution to sugary foods and show that complementary foods could contribute to decreasing energy purchases. Despite their significantly lower price elasticity, the tax has a similar effect on calories for the largest purchasers of SSBs. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available