4.5 Article

Effect of CGRP and sumatriptan on the BOLD response in visual cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 159-166

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1007/s10194-011-0415-4

Keywords

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP); Headache; Brain activity; Functional MRI; Sumatriptan; BOLD

Funding

  1. University of Copenhagen
  2. Danish Headache Society
  3. Lundbeck Foundation Center for Neurovascular Signaling (LUCENS)
  4. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation
  5. Danish Council for Independent Research-Medical Sciences (FSS) [271-08-0446]
  6. Merck Co., Inc. [33936]
  7. Allergan Inc
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. GlaxoSmithKline
  12. Janssen Pharmaceutical Products
  13. Lundbeck
  14. Merck
  15. Pfizer
  16. Norpharma
  17. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To test the hypothesis that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) modulates brain activity, we investigated the effect of intravenous CGRP on brain activity in response to a visual stimulus. In addition, we examined if possible alteration in brain activity was reversed by the anti-migraine drug sumatriptan. Eighteen healthy volunteers were randomly allocated to receive CGRP infusion (1.5 mu g/min for 20 min) or placebo. In vivo activity in the visual cortex was recorded before, during and after infusion and after 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan by functional magnetic resonance imaging (3 T). 77% of the participants reported headache after CGRP. We found no changes in brain activity after CGRP (P = 0.12) or after placebo (P = 0.41). Sumatriptan did not affect brain activity after CGRP (P = 0.71) or after placebo (P = 0.98). Systemic CGRP or sumatriptan has no direct effects on the BOLD activity in visual cortex. This suggests that in healthy volunteers both CGRP and sumatriptan may exert their actions outside of the blood-brain barrier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available