4.3 Article

Postconcussive Symptom Reporting Among US Combat Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury From Operation Iraqi Freedom

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 59-67

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182596382

Keywords

combat; concussion; depression; mild traumatic brain injury; military; posttraumatic stress disorder; PTSD

Funding

  1. US Navy Bureau of Medicine under the Wounded, Ill and Injured/Psychological Health/Traumatic Brain Injury Program [60819]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the association between postconcussive symptoms and mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) among combat veterans while adjusting for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Patients: Military personnel with provider-diagnosed MTBI (n = 334) or nonhead injury (n = 658) were identified from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database. Main Outcome Measures: Post-Deployment Health Assessments and Re-Assessments were used to examine postconcussive symptoms and self-rated health. Results: Personnel with MTBI were more likely to report headache (odds ratio [OR] = 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.19-5.17), back pain (OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.23-2.60), memory problems (OR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.20-2.88), tinnitus (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.10-2.41), and dizziness (OR = 2.13; 95% CI = 1.06-4.29) compared with those with non-head injuries. Among those with MTBI, self-reported decline in health was associated with memory problems (OR = 5.07; 95% CI = 2.56-10.02) and dizziness (OR = 10.60; 95% CI = 3.48-32.27). Conclusions: Mild traumatic brain injury is associated with reports of negative health consequences among combat veterans even when accounting for co-occurring psychological morbidity. The identification of postconcussive symptoms related to declines in a service member's self-rated health may be important in targeting and prioritizing clinical interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available