4.7 Article

Volumetric scale-up of smouldering remediation of contaminated materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages 51-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.053

Keywords

Contaminant remediation; Coal tar; Petrochemical; Process scale-up; Smouldering combustion

Funding

  1. Scottish Enterprise
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  3. WRAP in the United Kingdom
  4. Environmental Reclamation Services Ltd.
  5. SureClean Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Smouldering remediation is a process that has been introduced recently to address non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contamination in soils and other porous media. Previous work demonstrated this process to be highly effective across a wide range of contaminants and soil conditions at the bench scale. In this work, a suite of 12 experiments explored the effectiveness of the process as operating scale was increased 1000-fold from the bench (0.003 m(3)) to intermediate (0.3 m(3)) and pilot field-scale (3 m(3)) with coal tar and petrochemical NAPLs. As scale increased, remediation efficiency of 97-99.95% was maintained. Smouldering propagation velocities of 0.6-14 x 10(-5) m/s at Darcy air fluxes of 1.54-9.15 cm/s were consistent with observations in previous bench studies, as was the dependence on air flux. The pilot field-scale experiments demonstrated the robustness of the process despite heterogeneities, localised operation, controllability through airflow supply, and the importance of a minimum air flux for self-sustainability. Experiments at the intermediate scale established a minimum-observed, not minimum-possible, initial concentration of 12,000 mg/kg in mixed oil waste, providing support for the expectation that lower thresholds for self-sustaining smouldering decreased with increasing scale. Once the threshold was exceeded, basic process characteristics of average peak temperature, destructive efficiency, and treatment velocity were relatively independent of scale. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available