4.7 Article

Environment-oriented low-cost porous mullite ceramic membrane supports fabricated from coal gangue and bauxite

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages 136-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.026

Keywords

Coal gangue; Waste recycling; Ceramic membrane; Porous mullite; Mechanical strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21376102, 21301171]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [S2013010012199]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous mullite ceramic supports for filtration membrane were successfully fabricated via recycling of coal gangue and bauxite at sintering temperatures from 1100 to 1500 degrees C with corn starch as poreforming agent. The dynamic sintering behaviors, phase evolution, shrinkage, porosity and pore size, gas permeation flux, microstructure and mechanical property were systematically studied. A unique volume-expansion stage was observed at increased temperatures from 1276 to 1481 degrees C caused by a mullitization-crystal-growth process. During this stage, open porosity increases and pore size distributions broaden, which result in a maximum of nitrogen gas flux at 1400 degrees C. The X-ray diffraction results reveal that secondary mullitization took place from 1100 degrees C and the major phase is mullite with a content of similar to 84.7 wt.% at 1400 degrees C. SEM images show that the as-fabricated mullite supports have a porous microstructure composed of sintered glassy particles embedded with inter-locked mullite crystals, which grew gradually with increasing temperature from rod-like into blocky-like morphologies. To obtain mullite membrane supports with sufficient porosity and acceptable mechanical strength, the relationship between porosity and mechanical strength was investigated, which was fitted using a parabolic equation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available