4.7 Article

Size-resolved aerosol chemical analysis of extreme haze pollution events during early 2013 in urban Beijing, China

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages 452-460

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.023

Keywords

Haze pollution; Size distributions; Aerosol chemistry; Mass closure; Urban Beijing

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB05020000, XDA05100100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41230642, 41021004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using size-resolved filter sampling and chemical characterization, high concentrations of water-soluble ions, carbonaceous species and heavy metals were found in both fine (PM2.1) and coarse (PM2.1-9) particles in Beijing during haze events in early 2013. Even on clear days, average mass concentration of submicron particles (PM1.1) was several times higher than that previously measured in most of abroad urban areas. A high concentration of particulate matter on haze days weakens the incident solar radiation, which reduces the generation rate of secondary organic carbon in PM1.1. We show that the peak mass concentration of particles shifted from 0.43-0.65 mu m on clear days to 0.65-1.1 mu m on lightly polluted days and to 1.1-2.1 mu m on heavily polluted days. The peak shifts were also found for the following species: organic carbon, elemental carbon, NH4+, SO42-, NO3-, K, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb. Our findings demonstrate that secondary inorganic aerosols (36%) and organic matter (26%) dominated the fine particle mass on heavily polluted days, while their contribution reduced to 29% and 18%, respectively, on clear days. Besides fine particles, anthropogenic chemical species also substantially accumulated in the coarse mode, which suggests that particles with aerodynamic diameter larger than 2.1 mu m cannot be neglected during severe haze events. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available