4.7 Article

Biodegradation of sulfamethoxazole and other sulfonamides by Achromobacter denitrificans PR1

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages 741-749

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.039

Keywords

Pharmaceutical; Xenobiotics; Achromobacter; 3-Amino-5-methylisoxazole; Antibiotic resistance

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/AAC-AMB/113091/2009]
  2. European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) [TD0803]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BPD/80834/2011]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [20121001, 310030:146927]
  5. EC [265946]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/80834/2011, PTDC/AAC-AMB/113091/2009] Funding Source: FCT
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_146927] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to isolate and characterize a microbial culture able to degrade sulfonamides. Sulfamethoxazole (SMX)-degrading microorganisms were enriched from activated sludge and wastewater. The resultant mixed culture was composed of four bacterial strains, out of which only Achromobacter denitrificans PR1 could degrade SMX. This sulfonamide was used as sole source of carbon, nitrogen and energy with stoichiometric accumulation of 3-amino-5-methylisoxazole. Strain PR1 was able to remove SMX at a rate of 73.6 +/- 9.6 mu mol(SMX)/g(cell) (dry) (weight) h. This rate more than doubled when a supplement of amino acids or the other members of the mixed culture were added. Besides SMX, strain PR1 was able to degrade other sulfonamides with anti-microbial activity. Other environmental Achromobacter spp. could not degrade SMX, suggesting that this property is not broadly distributed in members of this genus. Further studies are needed to shed additional light on the genetics and enzymology of this process. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available