4.7 Article

Simultaneous removal of phenol, Cu and Cd from water with corn cob silica-alginate beads

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 272, Issue -, Pages 129-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.010

Keywords

Immobilized bacteria; Phenol; Heavy metals; Degradation; Corn cob silica; Pseudomonas putida

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - government (MEST) [2011-0020202]
  2. USDA multistate project [W2082]
  3. international collaborative research funds of Chonbuk National University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenol and heavy metals in petroleum waste are environmental and human health concerns, but physicochemical removal is often cost-prohibitive and can produce toxic secondary products and treatment residues. An environmentally benign alternative combines corn cob silica with alginate and immobilized bacteria into beads for treating contaminated water. The concentration of phenol was decreased >92% by Pseudomonas putida YNS1 on aliginate-silica beads (2%, w/v) after equilibrating for 96 h with water containing 214 mg phenol/L. GC-MS analysis indicated formation of benzoquinone and other polar products. Beads containing corn cob silica decreased Cu concentrations by 84-88% and Cd by 83-87% within 24 h. In a mixture of 114 mg phenol, 43 mg Cu and 51 mg Cd/L, phenol removal (93% within 96 h) only occurred with beads containing the silica and bacterial strain. Beads containing corn cob silica removed >97% of the Cu and >99% of the Cd, critical for reducing toxicity to the bacteria. Beads with the immobilized strain removed phenol when zeolite was used instead of corn cob silica, but beads with silica were more effective for Cu and Cd removal. Results show the potential of corn cob silica combined with alginate and immobilized bacteria for removing phenol and heavy metals from contaminated water. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available