4.7 Article

Immobilization of simulated radionuclide 133Cs+ by fly ash-based geopolymer

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages 325-331

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.049

Keywords

Fly ash; Geopolymer; Immobilization; 133Cs(+); Radioactive waste

Funding

  1. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51008154]
  3. Research Projects on Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province [2012030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent nuclear leak in Japan once again attracted people's attention to nuclear safety problems. Because of their poor thermal stability, those low-cost materials such as cement and asphalt cannot be used for the solidification of the radioactive wastes. In this work, the solidification behavior of 133Cs(+) by fly ash-based geopolymer was investigated. Leaching tests (carried out in deionized water, sulfuric acid and magnesium sulfate solutions) revealed that the geopolymer solidification had lower cumulative fraction leaching concentration (CFLC) of 133Cs(+) than that of cemented form. The thermal stability (high-temperature and freeze-thaw resistance) and acid-resistance of the geopolymer were also both better than that of cement. The geopolymer solidification block can acquire a compressive strength up to 30 MPa after 2 h calcination at 1000 degrees C. The morphology and mineral phases of the geopolymer and the geopolymer solidification block were characterized by SEM and XRD, and EDX analysis indicated that most of Cs associated with the amorphous geopolymer gel. These results gave encouragement for the idea that the fly ash-based geopolymer could be used as a low-cost and high-efficiency material for the immobilization of radioactive wastes. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available