4.7 Article

Biomonitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from coke oven emissions and reproductive toxicity in nonsmoking workers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages 436-443

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.008

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Semen quality; Morphology; Vitality; 1-Hydroxypyrene; DNA fragmentation

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (CDC/NIOSH) USA [1R03OH009504-01]
  2. Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Taiwan Council of Labor Affairs [IOSH99-M303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of the cross-sectional study was to assess whether exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from coke oven emissions contributed to alteration of semen quality and sperm DNA integrity in nonsmoking workers. Nonsmoking coke oven workers from a steel plant in Taiwan served as the exposure groups (topside-oven workers for the high exposure group and side-oven workers for the low exposure group), and administrators and security personnel in the plant served as the control. An exposure assessment was conducted to determine both particulate and gaseous phase of PAH levels and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) levels. Semen quality was analyzed according to WHO guidelines. DNA fragmentation and bulky DNA adducts were measured to assess sperm DNA integrity. There was no significant difference in sperm concentrations, vitality, and DNA fragmentation between the exposed group and the control. The high exposure group experienced significantly lower percentages of normal morphology as compared with the control (p = 0.0001). Bulky DNA adducts were detected in the exposed group that were significant higher than the control (p = 0.04). Exposure to PAHs from coke-oven emissions could contribute to increased levels of bulky DNA adducts in sperm. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available