4.7 Article

Phenol removal efficiencies of sewage treatment processes and ecological risks associated with phenols in effluents

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages 286-292

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.026

Keywords

Phenols; Sewage treatment process; Removal efficiency; Ecological risk

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20977102]
  2. Chinese Academy of Science [KZCX1-YW-06-02]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20110490768]
  4. Important National Science & Technology Specific Projects [2009ZX07527-001]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry [11K05ESPCR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenols pose a risk to the environment and to human health. Phenols found in rivers mainly originate from sewage treatment plants (STPs). In this paper, analytical procedures, based on deconvolution technology and retention time locking technology, were investigated to simultaneously identify and determine the concentrations of fifty different phenols in sewage water and effluents. Seventeen different phenols were found in sewage and five - including two regulated phenols (phenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol) and three un-regulated phenols (2-chlorophenol. 2,5-dichlorophenol and 2,4-dichloro-3-ethyl-6-nitrophenol) - were identified in effluents of five STPs. A number of processes undertaken in five STPs were also investigated. These processes can be used to remove phenols at efficiency levels of between 88.95% and 99.97%. Among the processes tested, a combination of anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A(2)/O), continuous microfiltration (CMF), ozone oxidation (O-3), and chlorination, appeared to be the best option for the removal of key phenols. Among the five phenols identified in effluents, 2,5-dichlorophenol (1.89 mu g/L) and 2,4-dichloro-3-ethyl-6-nitrophenol (22.6 mu g/L) pose the greatest ecological risk to receiving waters. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available