4.7 Article

Chromate reduction in Fe(II)-containing soil affected by hyperalkaline leachate from chromite ore processing residue

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages 15-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.067

Keywords

Chromium; COPR; Natural attenuation; Cr-speciation; Cr(VI) contaminated soils and groundwater

Funding

  1. University of Leeds
  2. STFC
  3. EPSRC [EP/E059678/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E059678/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly alkaline (pH 12.2) chromate contaminated leachate (990 mu mol L(-1)) has been entering soils below a chromite ore processing residue disposal (COPR) site for over 100 years. The soil immediately beneath the waste has a pH of 11 -> 12.5, contains 0.3 -> 0.5% (w/w) chromium. and 45 -> 75% of the microbially available iron is Fe(II). Despite elevated pH, a viable microbial consortium of Firmicutes dominated iron reducers was isolated from this COPR affected soil. Soil pH and Cr concentration decrease with distance from the waste. XAS analysis of soil samples indicated that Cr is present as a mixed Cr(III)-Fe(III) oxyhydroxide phase, suggesting that the elevated soil Cr content is due to reductive precipitation of Cr(VI) by Fe(II). Microcosm results demonstrate the capacity of COPR affected soil to abiotically remove all Cr(VI) from the leachate within 40 days. In air oxidation experiments less than 2% of the total Cr in the soil was remobilised despite significant Fe(II) oxidation. XAS analysis after air oxidation showed no change in Cr-speciation, indicating the Cr(III)-containing phase is a stable long term host for Cr. This work suggests that reductive precipitation of Cr(VI) is an effective method of contaminant immobilisation in soils where microbially produced Fe(II) is present. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available