4.7 Article

Thorough removal of inorganic and organic mercury from aqueous solutions by adsorption on Lemna minor powder

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 186, Issue 1, Pages 423-429

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.009

Keywords

Mercury remove; Lemna minor; Adsorption; Low residual concentration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20977074, 20775067]
  2. Science & Technology Committee of Fujian Province, China [2008F5063, 2010J06005]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University [200720]
  4. Education Committee of Fujian Province, China [200908]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The adsorption ability of duckweed (Lemna minor) powders for removing inorganic and organic mercury (methyl and ethyl mercury) has been studied using cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry. The optimal adsorption conditions were: (a) the pH value of the solution 7.0 for inorganic and ethyl mercury, 9.0 for methyl mercury, and (b) equilibrium adsorption time 10,20, and 40 min for inorganic mercury, methyl mercury, and ethyl mercury, respectively. After adsorption by L minor powder for 40 min, when the initial concentrations of inorganic and organic mercury were under 12.0 mu gL(-1) and 50.0 mu gL(-1), respectively, the residual concentrations of mercury could meet the criterion of drinking water (1.0 mu gL(-1)) and the permitted discharge limit of wastewater (10.0 mu gL(-1)) set by China and USEPA, respectively. Thorough removal of both inorganic and organic mercury from aqueous solutions was reported for the first time. The significant adsorption sites were C-O-P and phosphate groups by the surface electrostatic interactions with aqueous inorganic and organic mercury cations, and then the selective adsorption was resulted from the strong chelating interaction between amine groups and mercury on the surface of L minor cells. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available