4.7 Article

Adsorption behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the removal of olaquindox from aqueous solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages 389-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.100

Keywords

Olaquindox; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Adsorption; Kinetics; Thermodynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51178212]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [201102082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) were employed for the sorption of olaquindox COLA) from aqueous solution. A detailed study of the adsorption process was performed by varying pH, ionic strength, sorbent amount, sorption time and temperature. The adsorption mechanism is probably the non-electrostatic pi-pi dispersion interaction and hydrophobic interaction between OLA and MWCNT. The adsorption efficiency could reach 99.7%, suggesting that MWCNT is excellent adsorbents for effective OLA removal from water. OLA adsorption kinetics were found to be very fast and equilibrium was reached within 2.0 min following the pseudo-second-order model with observed rate constants (k) of 0.169-1.048 g mg(-1) min(-1) (at varied temperatures). The overall rate process appeared to be influenced by both external mass transfer and intraparticle diffusion, but mainly governed by intraparticle diffusion. A rapid initial adsorption behavior occurred within a short period of time in this adsorption system. The sorption data could be well interpreted by the Langmuir model with the maximum adsorption capacity of 133.156 mg g(-1) (293 K) of OLA on MWCNT. The mean energy of adsorption was calculated to be 0.124 kJ mol(-1) (293 K) from the Dubinin-Radushkevich adsorption isotherm. Moreover, the thermodynamic parameters showed the spontaneous, exothermic and physical nature of the adsorption process. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available