4.7 Article

Influence of microbial adaption and supplementation of nutrients on the biodegradation of ionic liquids in sewage sludge treatment processes

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 378-382

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.053

Keywords

Ionic liquids; Biodegradation; OECD 301; Adaptation; Supplementation

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N305 317040, N N305 359138, N N305 320636]
  2. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As ionic liquids are winning more attention from industry as a replacement of more hazardous chemicals, some of their structures have the potential to become persistent pollutants due to high stability towards abiotic and biotic degradation processes. Therefore it is important to determine the hazard associated with the presence of ILs in the environment, for example biodegradation under real conditions. Standard biodegradation testing procedures generally permit pre-conditioning of inoculum but do not allow for pre-exposition to the test substance. These are usually conducted in a mineral medium which does not provide additional organic nutrients. Though very valuable, as a point of reference, these tests do not fully represent real conditions. In in situ conditions, for example in wastewater treatment plants or natural soils and water bodies, the presence of readily available sources of energy and nutrients as well as the process of adaptation may often alter the fate and metabolic pathways of xenobiotics. Our results have shown that these are the opposing processes influencing the biodegradation rate of ILs in sewage sludge. The results have significant practical implications with respect to the assessment of biodegradability and environmental fate of ILs and other xenobiotics in environmental conditions and their potential remediation options. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available