4.7 Article

Application of a CCA-treated wood waste decontamination process to other copper-based preservative-treated wood after disposal

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 186, Issue 2-3, Pages 1880-1887

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.094

Keywords

Copper; CCA-treated wood; CA-treated wood; MCQ-treated wood; ACQ-treated wood; Acid leaching; Precipitation; Electrodeposition

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. FPInnovation
  3. Hydro-Quebec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood was widely used until 2004 for residential and industrial applications. Since 2004, CCA was replaced by alternative copper preservatives such as alkaline copper quaternary (ACQ), copper azole (CA) and micronized copper quaternary (MCQ), for residential applications due to health concerns. Treated wood waste disposal is becoming an issue. Previous studies identified a chemical process for decontaminating CCA-treated wood waste based on sulfuric acid leaching. The potential application of this process to wood treated with the copper-based preservatives (alkaline copper quaternary (ACQ), copper azole (CA) and micronized copper quaternary (MCQ)) is investigated here. Three consecutive leaching steps with 0.1 M sulfuric acid at 75 degrees C for 2 h were successful for all the types of treated wood and achieved more than 98% copper solubilisation. The different acidic leachates produced were successively treated by coagulation using ferric chloride and precipitation (pH = 7) using sodium hydroxide. Between 94 and 99% of copper in leachates could be recovered by electrodeposition after 90 min using 2A electrical current. Thus, the process previously developed for CCA-treated wood waste decontamination could be efficiently applied for CA-, ACQ- or MCQ-treated wood. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available