4.7 Article

Treatment of rinse water from zinc phosphate coating by batch and continuous electrocoagulation processes

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 173, Issue 1-3, Pages 326-334

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.092

Keywords

Phosphate removal; Zinc removal; Electrocoagulation; Aluminum electrode; Iron electrode; Operating cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment of spent final rinse water of zinc phosphating from an automotive assembly plant was investigated in an electrochemical cell equipped with aluminum or iron plate electrodes in a batch mode by electrocoagulation (EC). Effects of the process variables such as pH, current density, electrode material and operating time were explored with respect to phosphate and zinc removal efficiencies, electrical energy and electrode consumptions. The optimum operating conditions for removal of phosphate and zinc were current density of 60.0A/m(2), pH 5.0 and operating time of 25.0 min with Al electrode and current density of 60.0A/m(2), pH 3.0 and operating time of 15.0 min with Fe electrode, respectively. The highest phosphate and zinc removal efficiencies at optimum conditions were 97.7% and 97.8% for Fe electrode, and 99.8% and 96.7% for Al electrode. The electrode consumptions increased from 0.01 to 0.35 kg electrode/m(3) for Al electrode and from 0.20 to 0.62 kg electrode/m(3) for Fe electrode with increasing current density from 10.0 to 100.0 A/m(2). The energy consumptions were 0.18-11.29 kWh/m(3) for Al electrode and 0.24-8.47 kWh/m(3) for Fe electrode in the same current density range. Removal efficiencies of phosphate and zinc were found to decrease when flow rate was increased from 50 to 400mL/min in continuous mode of operation. The morphology and elements present in the sludge was also characterized by using SEM and EDX. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available