4.7 Article

Properties of sintered glass-ceramics prepared from plasma vitrified air pollution control residues

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 173, Issue 1-3, Pages 563-569

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.123

Keywords

Energy from waste; Air pollution control residues; Hazardous waste treatment; Plasma vitrification; Glass-ceramics

Funding

  1. UK Technology Strategy Board
  2. Defra
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F033605/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/F033605/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air pollution control (APC) residues, obtained from a major UK energy from waste (EfW) plant, processing municipal solid waste, have been blended with silica and alumina and melted using DC plasma arc technology. The glass produced was crushed, milled, uni-axially pressed and sintered at temperatures between 750 and 1150 degrees C, and the glass-ceramics formed were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Mechanical properties assessed included Vickers's hardness, flexural strength, Young's modulus and thermal shock resistance. The optimum sintering temperature was found to be 950 degrees C. This produced a glass-ceramic with high density (similar to 2.58 g/cm(3)), minimum water absorption (similar to 2%) and relatively high mechanical strength (similar to 81 +/- 4 MPa). Thermal shock testing showed that 950 degrees C sintered samples could withstand a 700 degrees C quench in water without micro-cracking. The research demonstrates that glass-ceramics can be readily formed from DC plasma treated APC residues and that these have comparable properties to marble and porcelain. This novel approach represents a technically and commercially viable treatment option for APC residues that allow the beneficial reuse of this problematic waste. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available