4.7 Article

Growth inhibition in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) growth exposed to di-n-butyl phthalate

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 163, Issue 2-3, Pages 625-631

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.025

Keywords

Endocrine disruptor; Di-n-butyl phthalate; Chinese cabbage; Hydroponic methods; Proteomics

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China [NSC 94-2313-B-002-114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The toxicity and effects of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), an endocrine disruptor, on the growth of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) were studied. Etiolation occurred on leaves of Chinese cabbage plant treated with 50 mg/L of DBP for 42 d. DBP even below I mg/L had a significant effect on the concentration of chlorophyll in Chinese cabbage and the biomass showed a severe decrease under treatment with more than 30 mg/L of DBR At a concentration below 1 mg/L of DBR no significant difference in accumulation was found, but treatments with concentration exceeding 10, 30, 50 and 100 mg/L all resulted in significant accumulation of DBR Six protein spots extracted from leaf tissue of DBP-treated Chinese cabbage displaying a differential expression are shown in 2-DE maps. According to proteome level studies, three protein spots were found to increase and were identified, respectively, as acyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] desaturase (acyl-ACP desaturase), root phototropism protein 3 (RPT3) and ferredoxin-nitrite reductase (Fd-NiR). The other three protein spots were found to decrease and were identified respectively as dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR), aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) and ATP synthase subunit beta. The key finding is that the other closely related plant, Bok choy (Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis), the subspecies of Chinese cabbage, respond differently to the same chemicals. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available