4.7 Article

Electrocoagulation of simulated reactive dyebath effluent with aluminum and stainless steel electrodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 164, Issue 2-3, Pages 1586-1594

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.004

Keywords

Electrocoagulation with aluminum and stainless steel electrodes; Reactive dyebath effluent; COD and color removal; Process optimization; Current density; AOX abatement; Electrical energy consumption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive dyebath effluents are ideal candidates for electrocoagulation due to their intensive color, medium strength, recalcitrant COD and high electrolyte (NaCl) content. The present study focused on the treatability of simulated reactive dyebath effluent (COD0 = 300mg/L; color in terms of absorbance values A(0.436) = 0.532 cm(-1), A(0.525) = 0.693 cm(-1) and A(0.620) =0.808 cm(-1)) employing electrocoagulation with aluminum and stainless steel electrodes. Optimization of critical operating parameters such as initial pH (pH(0) 3-11). applied current density (J(c) = 22-87 mA/cm(2)) and electrolyte type (NaCl or Na2SO4) improved the overall treatment efficiencies resulting in effective decolorization (99% using stainless steel electrodes after 60 min, 95% using aluminum electrodes after 90 min electrocoagulation) and COD abatement (93% with stainless steel electrodes after 60 min, 86% with aluminum electrodes after 90 min of reaction time). Optimum electrocoagulation conditions were established as pH(0) 5 and J(c) = 22 mA/cm(2) for both electrode materials. The COD and color removal efficiencies also depended on the electrolyte type. No in situ, surplus adsorbable organically bound halogens (AOX) formation associated with the use of NaCl as the electrolyte during electrocoagulation was detected. An economical evaluation was also carried out within the frame of the study. It was demonstrated that electrocoagulation of reactive dyebath effluent with aluminum and stainless steel electrodes was a considerably less electrical energy-intensive, alternative treatment method as compared with advanced chemical oxidation techniques. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available